Nautilus with Cassiopeia: In line, the pair 47.0% over 198 games.
In line
Nautilus
Pair win rate
47.0%
expected 49.1
▼ 2.1 pts under expected
Grades
Nautilus alone
LP a game
−0.8est.
- Win
- 50.0%
- ▲0.2 vs Bot
- LP a game
- +0.60
- ±1.17
- Games
- 1,613
- a win +23.8 · a loss −22.6
- Pick · Ban
- 0.53 · 1.6%
- as Bot · any role
Cassiopeia's partners
Better together0
In line4
Worse together0
Every partner as a table17 with 30+ games
| Partner | Pair | Synergy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nautilus | 198 | 47.0%40%–54% | −2.1 | 49.0% | ||
| Thresh | 134 | 52.2%44%–61% | +0.3 | 51.9% | ||
| Alistar | 113 | 57.5%48%–66% | +5.4 | 52.1% | ||
| Leona | 105 | 59.1%49%–68% | +7.6 | 51.4% | ||
| Blitzcrank | 98 | 57.1%47%–66% | +5.8 | 51.2% | ||
| Nami | 81 | 64.2%53%–74% | +14.1 | 50.0% | ||
| Pyke | 68 | 45.6%34%–57% | −3.9 | 49.5% | ||
| Rell | 61 | 54.1%42%–66% | +0.8 | 53.2% | ||
| Bard | 57 | 45.6%33%–58% | −3.3 | 48.8% | ||
| Rakan | 57 | 52.6%40%–65% | +1.1 | 51.4% | ||
| Senna | 56 | 48.2%36%–61% | −2.8 | 51.0% | ||
| Seraphine | 46 | 43.5%30%–58% | −6.7 | 50.2% | ||
| Soraka | 45 | 42.2%29%–57% | −8.3 | 50.4% | ||
| Pantheon | 38 | 55.3%40%–70% | +7.0 | 48.2% | ||
| Janna | 35 | 45.7%30%–62% | −5.5 | 51.1% | ||
| Zilean | 34 | 38.2%24%–55% | −12.6 | 50.8% | ||
| Karma | 34 | 61.8%45%–76% | +13.6 | 48.1% |
Questions
What is the best support to play with Cassiopeia?
Leona: 59.1% over 105 games in Master and above on all servers, patch 26.21 (95% range 49.5 to 68.0%). Then Alistar 57.5% and Thresh 52.2%.
Who plays with Cassiopeia most on all servers?
Nautilus 47.0% (198 games), Thresh 52.2% (134), Alistar 57.5% (113), Leona 59.1% (105); Master and above on all servers, patch 26.21.
Which partners are better together with Cassiopeia?
None of the 4 ranked partners clearly wins more with Cassiopeia than their own win rates suggest.
How many games is this based on?
1,613 Cassiopeia ADC games in Master and above on all servers, patch 26.21 to 29 Oct. Partners need 100+ games to be ranked.